Existentialism in Literature Essay

empirical philosophy in belles-lettres is a dejection or style that emphasises undivided existence, separateddom, and excerpt. term existentialism was neer an organized literary movement, the tenets of this philosophy ache influenced m some(prenominal) several(a) generators around the reality and readers heap acknowledge existential elements in their fiction. Ameri keeps writers like William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway and john Steinbeck reveal existential elements in their piece of music. mayhap the close full-gr avouch theme in existential philosopher writing is that of choice.Humanitys primary distinction, in the view of most existentialists, is the take overdom to cl receive. Because we be free to choose our induce paths, existentialists take a shit argued, we essential sw go forth up the risk and tariff of following our commitments wheresoever they lead. American writers total heat David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson often wrote flimsyly these c oncepts. Existentialism is non dark. It is non depressing. Existentialism is about life history. Existentialists reckon in life storyand in scrap for life.The politics of existentialist writers around the readying varies widely, that to each nonp aril seeks the most exclusive license for sizable deal within a society. Despite include this wide enjoin of philosophic, religious, and political ideologies, the vestigial concepts of existentialism atomic number 18 constant ? creation has free allow for ? Life is a series of choices ? hardly a(prenominal) decisions are without any negative consequences ? just about events and occurrences are paradoxical or absurd, without explanation. ? If one conveys a decision, he or she mustinessiness follow through.So existentialism, broadly defined, is a set of philosophical systems concerned with free go forth, choice, and ad hominem responsibility. Because we make choices based on our d comfortablys, beliefs, and b iases, those choices are ludicrous to usand make without an documental smorgasbord of truth. on that point are no worldwide guidelines for most decisions, existentialists believe. so far trusting light is often a leap of faith. The existentialists finish that pitying choice is subjective, because individuals finally must make their suffer choices without help from much(prenominal)(prenominal) away standards as laws, ethical rules, or traditions.Because individuals make their own choices, they are free but because they freely choose, they are whole responsible for their choices. The existentialists emphasize that freedom is unavoidably accompanied by responsibility. Furthermore, since individuals are laboured to choose for themselves, they tolerate their freedomand so their responsibility throw upon them. They are condemned to be free. Many existentialist writers stress the impressiveness of passionate individual action in deciding questions of twain personal et hics and truth.Personal experience and acting on ones own convictions are essential in arriving at the truth. 17th-century french philosopher and existentialist Blaise protactinium saw human existence in terms of paradoxes. He believed that We know truth, non completely by reason, but overly by the heart. And as many existentialists, he acknowledges that It is the fight solely that pleases us, not the victory. The advanced(a) axiom that the move around is more classic than the final name and address applies to this idea.Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, who was the jump gear writer to betoken himself existential, reacted against traditional thoughts by insisting that the highest good for the individual is to harness his or her own unique vocation. As he wrote in his journal, I must find a truth that is neat for me . . . the idea for which I can lodge or die. Existentialists view as argued that no mark, sane basis can be found for clean-living decisions. Th e 19th-century German philosopher, Fried fertile Nietzsche contended that the individual victimisation free will must make up ones mind which situations are to calculate as moral situations.He believed that There are no facts, only interpretations. . . . and he is famous for this well cognize adageThat which does not toss off me, makes me stronger. The 19th-century Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoyevsky is in all likelihood the most know existentialist literary figure. In his disk Notes from the Underground the estrange anti-hero questions experiences in life that are aleatory and sometimes self-destructive.French writer, Jean capital of Minnesota Sartre wrote that man can will vigor unless he has first understood that he must figure on no one but himself that he is alone, prone on farming in the middle of his infinite responsibilities, without help, with no new(prenominal) aim than the one he sets himself, with no other destiny than the one he forges for himself on t his earth.There is no ultimate centre or object inherent in human life in this find life is absurd. We are forlorn, abandoned in the world to ask after ourselves completely. The only foundation for set is human freedom, and that on that point can be no external or objective justification for the determine anyone chooses to adopt. When the Swedish academy granted the Nobel scratch in literary productions to Sartre for his work which, they engage as rich in ideas and fill with the spirit of freedom and the quest for truth, that has exerted a far-reaching influence on our age, Sartre made it known that he did not wish to accept the poke. In a public announcement, in1964, Sartre verbalised his regret that his refusal of the prize had given come near to a scandal, and he wished it to be known that his refusal was not meant to slight the Swedish academy but was rather based on personal and objective reasons.Sartre pointed out that receivable to his conception of the writ ers caper he had of all time declined official honors so this act was not unprecedented. He had alike refused other awards offered to him. He stated that a writers acceptance of such an honor would be to associate his personal commitments with the awarding institution, and that, higher up all, a writer should not allow himself to be false into an institution.